× How Are New Vaccines Prioritized in Low-Income Countries? A Case Study of Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine and Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Uganda

× Assessing and Improving Performance: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in a Canadian Health Region

× What Factors Do Allied Health Take Into Account When Making Resource Allocation Decisions?

× Prioritising, Ranking and Resource Implementation - A Normative Analysis

× Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage

× Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy

× Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist

× Decisions of Value: Going Backstage Comment on “Contextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis”

× Understanding Contextual Factors in Cost, Quality and Priority Setting Decisions in Health Comment on “Contextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis”

× Disease Control Priorities Third Edition: Time to Put a Theory of Change Into Practice Comment on “Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy”

×

The Future of Disease Control Priorities Comment on “Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy”

× Where Do We Start? Building Consensus on Drivers of Health Sector Corruption in Nigeria and Ways to Address It

× Transforming Disciplinary Traditions Comment on “Problems and Promises of Health Technologies: The Role of Early Health Economic Modeling”

× Around the Tables – Contextual Factors in Healthcare Coverage Decisions Across Western Europe

× Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand

× Does the Narrative About the Use of Evidence in Priority Setting Vary Across Health Programs Within the Health Sector: A Case Study of 6 Programs in a Low-Income National Healthcare System

× The Dutch Citizen Forum on Public Reimbursement of Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Opinion Change

× CHAT SA: Modification of a Public Engagement Tool for Priority Setting for a South African Rural Context

× Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for HTA Around the Globe: Exploring the Next Frontiers of HTA and Best Practices Comment on “Use of Evidence-informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe”

× Ethical and Social Values for Paediatric Health Technology Assessment and Drug Policy

× Advancing the WHO-INTEGRATE Framework as a Tool for Evidence-Informed, Deliberative Decision-Making Processes: Exploring the Views of Developers and Users of WHO Guidelines

× Priority Setting in HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria – New Cost-Effectiveness Results From WHO-CHOICE

× Barriers to Equitable Public Participation in Health-System Priority Setting Within the Context of Decentralization: The Case of Vulnerable Women in a Ugandan District

× Clinical Priority Setting and Decision-Making in Sweden: A Cross-sectional Survey Among Physicians

× Strengthening Research and Practice in Community Health Systems: A Research Agenda and Manifesto

× Challenges and Opportunities for Deliberative Processes for Healthcare Decision-Making Comment on “Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design – Part II: A Practical Guide”

× Institutionalisation Is a Vital Element for Fairness of Priority Setting in the Package Design if the Target is Universal Health Coverage Comment on “Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefits Package Design – Part II: A Practical Guide”

× The Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit (MSSU) Bridge Process: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Address Priority Health Issues and Increase Collaborative Research in Nova Scotia, Canada

× Harnessing Country Experiences for Health Benefit Package Design: Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes and Experiences From the Joint Learning Network Comment on “Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design – Part II: A Practical Guide”

× The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Designing the Essential Package of Health Services in Pakistan

× Assessing Global Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness to Inform Development of Pakistan’s Essential Package of Health Services

× The Use of Evidence to Design an Essential Package of Health Services in Pakistan: A Review and Analysis of Prioritisation Decisions at Different Stages of the Appraisal Process